Am Freitag, den 30.08.2013, 15:36 +1000 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2013, 17:09 +1000 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> > MSIs were only problematic on some old, broken chipsets. But now that we
> >>>>>>>>>>> > already see systems where PCI legacy interrupts are somewhat flaky, it's
> >>>>>>>>>>> > really time to move to MSIs.
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>>>>>> > ---
> >>>>>>>>>>> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h | 1 +
> >>>>>>>>>>> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>>> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
> >>>>>>>>>>> > index 9d2cd20..ce6569f 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
> >>>>>>>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h
> >>>>>>>>>>> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ struct nouveau_mc_intr {
> >>>>>>>>>>> > struct nouveau_mc {
> >>>>>>>>>>> > struct nouveau_subdev base;
> >>>>>>>>>>> > const struct nouveau_mc_intr *intr_map;
> >>>>>>>>>>> > + bool use_msi;
> >>>>>>>>>>> > };
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > static inline struct nouveau_mc *
> >>>>>>>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>>>>>>>>>> > index ec9cd6f..02b337e 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>>>>>>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>>>>>>>>>> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >>>>>>>>>>> > */
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > #include <subdev/mc.h>
> >>>>>>>>>>> > +#include <core/option.h>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > static irqreturn_t
> >>>>>>>>>>> > nouveau_mc_intr(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>>>>>>> > @@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ nouveau_mc_intr(int irq, void *arg)
> >>>>>>>>>>> > map++;
> >>>>>>>>>>> > }
> >>>>>>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>>>>>> > + if (pmc->use_msi)
> >>>>>>>>>>> > + nv_wr08(pmc->base.base.parent, 0x00088068, 0xff);
> >>>>>>>>>>> Register not present everywhere.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> At the very least, the enabling of MSI should be disallowed on the
> >>>>>>>>>>> earlier chipsets where it's not supported. Though, it's perhaps
> >>>>>>>>>>> possible that the pci_enable_msi() call will fail in all of these
> >>>>>>>>>>> cases anyway.. I'm not certain.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> MSIs are required property for everything doing PCIe. So the only cases
> >>>>>>>>>> where this should fail is plain PCI/AGP devices. I don't really have a
> >>>>>>>>>> test system for those old cards set up.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But I remember Ilia having some legacy things plugged in, so maybe he
> >>>>>>>>>> could test this patch and see how it goes?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sure, let me know what you need -- I have nv18 PCI, nv34 PCIe (note
> >>>>>>>>> that it's not native PCIe, but some sort of bridge thing IIRC),
> >>>>>>>> Cases like the nv34 here (i think there's some nv4x that aren't native
> >>>>>>>> pcie too) are what I'm wondering about primarily.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And rightly so. With the NV18 PCI, NV34 PCIe, NV42 PCIe plugged in,
> >>>>>>> with "AutoAddGPU" disabled the NV18 and NV42 seem fine. However merely
> >>>>>>> starting X (not xinit, not startx, not [gkx]dm) on the NV34 and ^C'ing
> >>>>>>> it (with no clients connecting to said X), causes a "failed to idle
> >>>>>>> channel" message in dmesg, which apparently never rectifies itself, so
> >>>>>>> X is hung forever. FTR, there were no displays connected either, but I
> >>>>>>> tried the exact same procedure without the MSI patch and it worked
> >>>>>>> fine. Here is the init sequence with the MSI patch:
> >>>>>> I don't suppose bashing 0x1868 instead of 0x88068 works here? If not,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should that work on the NV42 as well?
> >>>> I believe so. NV4x has both the 0x18xx and 0x88xxx apertures I believe.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> next thing would be to mmiotrace the binary driver and see if you can
> >>>>>> make it enable+use MSI on it. I doubt the current legacy driver does
> >>>>>> it by default, but there was some magic to enable it that you can
> >>>>>> probably find if you google around.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've yet to set up the legacy driver... I bet it doesn't compile on
> >>>>> 3.11, so I'll have to patch it to nuke procfs/i2c...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [ 307.049812] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x034a00b1
> >>>>>>> [ 307.049815] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] Chipset: NV34 (NV34)
> >>>>>>> [ 307.049819] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:04:00.0] Family : NV30
> >>>>>>> [ 307.050648] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PRAMIN for image...
> >>>>>>> [ 307.050652] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... signature not found
> >>>>>>> [ 307.050653] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] checking PROM for image...
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195201] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] ... appears to be valid
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195205] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] using image from PROM
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195209] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] BMP version 5.29
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195429] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] version 04.34.20.79.00
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195971] nouveau [ DEVINIT][0000:04:00.0] adaptor not initialised
> >>>>>>> [ 307.195979] nouveau [ VBIOS][0000:04:00.0] running init tables
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209253] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: irq 47 for MSI/MSI-X
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209266] nouveau [ PMC][0000:04:00.0] MSI interrupts enabled
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209281] nouveau W[ PTIMER][0000:04:00.0] unknown input clock freq
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209288] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] RAM type: DDR1
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209290] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] RAM size: 64 MiB
> >>>>>>> [ 307.209292] nouveau [ PFB][0000:04:00.0] ZCOMP: 0 tags
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215653] nouveau [ DRM] VRAM: 63 MiB
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215656] nouveau [ DRM] GART: 128 MiB
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215659] nouveau [ DRM] BMP version 5.41
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215662] nouveau [ DRM] DCB version 2.2
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215666] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 00: 01000300 000088b8
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215669] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 01: 02010310 000088b8
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215672] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 02: 01000302 00000000
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215676] nouveau [ DRM] DCB outp 03: 04010312 00000000
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215686] nouveau [ DRM] Adaptor not initialised, running
> >>>>>>> VBIOS init tables.
> >>>>>>> [ 307.215964] nouveau [ DRM] Saving VGA fonts
> >>>>>>> [ 307.310084] [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010).
> >>>>>>> [ 307.310087] [drm] No driver support for vblank timestamp query.
> >>>>>>> [ 307.310093] nouveau [ DRM] 0xB61E: Parsing digital output script table
> >>>>>>> [ 307.360111] nouveau [ DRM] 0xB70B: Parsing digital output script table
> >>>>>>> [ 307.410799] nouveau [ DRM] 0 available performance level(s)
> >>>>>>> [ 307.410804] nouveau [ DRM] c: core 249MHz memory 405MHz
> >>>>>>> [ 307.412062] nouveau [ DRM] MM: using M2MF for buffer copies
> >>>>>>> [ 307.442478] nouveau 0000:04:00.0: No connectors reported connected with modes
> >>>>>>> [ 307.442483] [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes - going 1024x768
> >>>>>>> [ 307.442669] nouveau [ DRM] allocated 1024x768 fb: 0x9000, bo
> >>>>>>> ffff8801c73c3800
> >>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>> [ 360.414044] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
> >>>>>>> [ 375.403288] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
> >>>>>>> [ 390.392407] nouveau E[ X[8294]] failed to idle channel 0xcccc0001 [X[8294]]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In case it's of interest, this is a Quadro NVS 280 card, here is the
> >>>>>>> lspci output:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: NVIDIA Corporation NV37GL
> >>>>>>> [Quadro PCI-E Series] [10de:00fd] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA
> >>>>>>> controller])
> >>>>>>> Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation Device [10de:0215]
> >>>>>>> Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> >>>>>>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
> >>>>>>> Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> >>>>>>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> >>>>>>> Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
> >>>>>>> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 47
> >>>>>>> Region 0: Memory at f4000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
> >>>>>>> Region 1: Memory at c0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
> >>>>>>> Region 2: Memory at f5000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
> >>>>>>> [virtual] Expansion ROM at f6000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
> >>>>>>> Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2
> >>>>>>> Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
> >>>>>>> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
> >>>>>>> Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
> >>>>>>> Capabilities: [68] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+
> >>>>>>> Address: 00000000feeff00c Data: 4162
> >>>>>>> Capabilities: [78] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
> >>>>>>> DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
> >>>>>>> <512ns, L1 <4us
> >>>>>>> ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
> >>>>>>> DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal-
> >>>>>>> Unsupported-
> >>>>>>> RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+
> >>>>>>> MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
> >>>>>>> DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq-
> >>>>>>> AuxPwr- TransPend-
> >>>>>>> LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s,
> >>>>>>> Latency L0 <2us, L1 <16us
> >>>>>>> ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot-
> >>>>>>> LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 128 bytes Disabled- Retrain- CommClk-
> >>>>>>> ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
> >>>>>>> LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train-
> >>>>>>> SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
> >>>>>>> Capabilities: [100 v1] Virtual Channel
> >>>>>>> Caps: LPEVC=0 RefClk=100ns PATEntryBits=1
> >>>>>>> Arb: Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128-
> >>>>>>> Ctrl: ArbSelect=Fixed
> >>>>>>> Status: InProgress-
> >>>>>>> VC0: Caps: PATOffset=00 MaxTimeSlots=1 RejSnoopTrans-
> >>>>>>> Arb: Fixed- WRR32- WRR64- WRR128- TWRR128- WRR256-
> >>>>>>> Ctrl: Enable+ ID=0 ArbSelect=Fixed TC/VC=ff
> >>>>>>> Status: NegoPending- InProgress-
> >>>>>>> Capabilities: [128 v1] Power Budgeting <?>
> >>>>>>> Kernel driver in use: nouveau
> >>>>>>> Kernel modules: nouveau
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let me know if you have any questions about my setup.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -ilia
> >>>
> >>> Same problem with the following (whitespace-damanged) diff applied on top:
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>> index 02b337e..68a51d4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
> >>> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ nouveau_mc_intr(int irq, void *arg)
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> if (pmc->use_msi)
> >>> - nv_wr08(pmc->base.base.parent, 0x00088068, 0xff);
> >>> + nv_wr08(pmc->base.base.parent, 0x1868, 0xff);
> >>>
> >>> if (intr) {
> >>> nv_error(pmc, "unknown intr 0x%08x\n", stat);
> >>> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ nouveau_mc_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent,
> >>> struct nouveau_object *engine,
> >>> if (ret) {
> >>> pmc->use_msi = false;
> >>> } else {
> >>> - nv_wr08(device, 0x00088068, 0xff);
> >>> + nv_wr08(device, 0x1868, 0xff);
> >>> nv_info(pmc, "MSI interrupts enabled\n");
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> I guess this needs a way of telling whether it has "for real" MSI or
> >>> not. That 1800 range is on NV41:NV50 according to rnndb, which
> >>> probably means that it's safe to use msi on nv41+ (via the 88068
> >>> address, since the 1800 stuff disappears on nv50+). [Based purely on
> >>> speculation, btw, not on hardware experimentation. I assume
> >>> pci_enable_msi() would implicitly fail on any non-pcie card, e.g. nv4a
> >>> which is an agp version of nv44, and all the pci versions of the 6200
> >>> (and later) cards... i think there are some 8-series pci cards too.]
> >> Yeah, I suspect the only case we need to explicitly detect is the
> >> BR02-using pretend PCIE cards.
> >>
> >> What's the pccid of your nv3x board?
> >
> > I assume that was a typo and you meant "pci id"? If so, 10de:00fd. You
> > can see the full info (including ids) in the quoted part above.
> Lucas,
>
> Would you be OK with the patch still, but blacklisting devices with
> 10de:00fX/10de:02eX pciids?
>
> These seem to be the two ranges that indicate that a bridge device is
> present (according to xf86-video-nv).
>
Ok, will put this in for a respin of the series. I personally don't care
too much about cards < NV50 at the moment, but if blacklisting those two
ranges helps to avoid any breakage it's obviously the right thing to do.
Lucas
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
