Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC PATCH v6] dmabuf-sync: Add a buffer synchronization framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_dmabuf_sync_supported);
> > 
> > _GPL ?
> > 
> > I would also prefix it with 'dmabuf_is_sync_supported' just to make
> > all of the libraries call start with 'dmabuf'
> > 
> 
> Seems better. Will change it to dmabuf_is_sync_supported, and use
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.

One thing thought - while I suggest that you use GPL variant
I think you should check who the consumers are. As in, if nvidia
wants to use it it might make their lawyers unhappy - and in turn
means that their engineers won't be able to use these symbols.

So - if there is a strong argument to not have it GPL - then please
say so. 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux