Re: drm fixes for 3.11: Tag more patches for stable?

[Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 09.08.2013 11:25, schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Dear Dave,
>
>
> Am Freitag, den 09.08.2013, 05:53 +0100 schrieb Dave Airlie:
>
> […]
>
> > The following changes since commit c095ba7224d8edc71dcef0d655911399a8bd4a3f:
> >
> >    Linux 3.11-rc4 (2013-08-04 13:46:46 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> >    git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-fixes
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to e42f5814212079aecd5826dba10588a896ac0862:
> >
> >    Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2013-08-08' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel into drm-fixes (2013-08-09 09:09:37 +1000)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Aaron Lu (1):
> >        drm/i915: avoid brightness overflow when doing scale
> >
> > Alex Deucher (11):
> >        drm/radeon: properly handle pm on gpu reset
> >        drm/radeon: select audio dto based on encoder id for DCE3
> >        drm/radeon/dpm: adjust thermal protection requirements
> >        drm/radeon/dpm: fix spread spectrum setup (v2)
> >        drm/radeon/dpm: adjust power state properly for UVD on SI
> >        drm/radeon/dpm: disable sclk ss on rv6xx
> >        drm/radeon: fix audio dto calculation on DCE3+ (v3)
> >        drm/radeon: always program the MC on startup
> >        drm/radeon/cik: use a mutex to properly lock srbm instanced registers
> >        drm/radeon/dpm: require rlc for dpm
> >        drm/radeon: make missing smc ucode non-fatal
> >
> > Christian König (5):
> >        drm/radeon: fix halting UVD
> >        drm/radeon: only save UVD bo when we have open handles
> >        drm/radeon: stop sending invalid UVD destroy msg
> >        drm/radeon: add more UVD CS checking
> >        drm/radeon: remove unnecessary unpin
> as UVD is also in 3.10 should more of these be tagged
> `stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx` too? I only checked
>
>          drm/radeon: add more UVD CS checking
>
> and it did not have that tag.

That patch doesn't have the tag because it is a (minor) new feature to 
check the incoming parameters for incorrect values and not a bugfix.

The other three UVD patches are bugfixes and indeed does have the 
necessary tag.

Regards,
Christian.

> […]
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel