Re: [PATCH] drm: Don't pass negative delta to ktime_sub_ns()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



               vimOn Mit, 2013-07-17 at 12:58 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:58:44AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > It takes an unsigned value. This happens not to blow up on 64-bit
> > architectures, but it does on 32-bit, causing
> > drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos() to calculate totally bogus
> > timestamps for vblank events. Which in turn causes e.g. gnome-shell to
> > hang after a DPMS off cycle with current xf86-video-ati Git.
> > 
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Dave, it looks like you missed this patch.

Dave, any particular reason why this fix still isn't merged? It's
approaching its two-month anniversary...


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |                   http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux