Op 07-08-13 02:05, Dave Airlie schreef: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:13:41AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >>> The check needs to be for > 1, because ctx->acquired is already incremented. >>> This will prevent ww_mutex_lock_slow from returning -EDEADLK and not locking >>> the mutex. It caused a lot of false gpu lockups on radeon with >>> CONFIG_DEBUG_WW_MUTEX_SLOWPATH=y because a function that shouldn't be able >>> to return -EDEADLK did. >>> >>> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Should this be merged via Ingo? or will I queue it in my -fixes? > > Dave. > It's in tip:core/urgent, so I imagine you don't need to queue it. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
