On 22/11/2023 13:55, Andy Yan wrote: > From: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The vop2 on rk3588 is similar to which on rk356x > but with 4 video ports and need to reference > more grf modules. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > - fix errors when running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > > .../display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml > index b60b90472d42..24148d9b3b14 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/rockchip/rockchip-vop2.yaml > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties: > enum: > - rockchip,rk3566-vop > - rockchip,rk3568-vop > + - rockchip,rk3588-vop > > reg: > items: > @@ -42,26 +43,47 @@ properties: > frame start (VSYNC), line flag and other status interrupts. > > clocks: > + minItems: 3 > items: > - description: Clock for ddr buffer transfer. > - description: Clock for the ahb bus to R/W the phy regs. > - description: Pixel clock for video port 0. > - description: Pixel clock for video port 1. > - description: Pixel clock for video port 2. > + - description: Pixel clock for video port 4. > + - description: Peripheral clock for vop on rk3588. > > clock-names: > + minItems: 3 You relax requirements for all existing variants here which is not explained in commit msg. I assume this was not intentional, so you need to re-constrain them in allOf:if:then. See for example: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,exynos7-clock.yaml#L57 for some ideas. > items: > - const: aclk > - const: hclk > - const: dclk_vp0 > - const: dclk_vp1 > - const: dclk_vp2 > + - const: dclk_vp3 > + - const: pclk_vop > > rockchip,grf: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > description: > Phandle to GRF regs used for misc control > > + rockchip,vo-grf: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + Phandle to VO GRF regs used for misc control, required for rk3588 Drop last sentence, instead add it to required in allOf:if:then. Is this valid for other variants? If not, should be disallowed in allOf:if:then: for them. > + > + rockchip,vop-grf: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + Phandle to VOP GRF regs used for misc control, required for rk3588 > + > + rockchip,pmu: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + Phandle to PMU regs used for misc control, required for rk3588 For all these three: what is "misc control"? Way too vague. Everything is a misc and everything can be control. You must be here specific and much more descriptive. > + > ports: > $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports > > @@ -81,6 +103,11 @@ properties: > description: > Output endpoint of VP2 > > + port@3: > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > + description: > + Output endpoint of VP3 Valid for other variants? Best regards, Krzysztof