On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Christian König
<deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>
> Currently doesn't matter cause we allocate the fence in the
> lower 265MB anyway.
>
> Reported-by: Frank Huang <FrankR.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Applied to my fixes tree. Thanks!
Alex
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> index 2d3655f..44bdb28 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> @@ -3019,7 +3019,7 @@ void r600_uvd_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev,
> struct radeon_fence *fence)
> {
> struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[fence->ring];
> - uint32_t addr = rdev->fence_drv[fence->ring].gpu_addr;
> + uint64_t addr = rdev->fence_drv[fence->ring].gpu_addr;
>
> radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(UVD_CONTEXT_ID, 0));
> radeon_ring_write(ring, fence->seq);
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
