Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Unified VMA Offset Manager v2 (+Render Node RFC)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/07/2013 19:17, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> This is v2 of the unified VMA offset manager series. The first draft is
>> available at LWN [1]. This series replaces the VMA offset managers in GEM
>> and
>> TTM with a unified implementation.
>>
>> The first 4 patches contain the new VMA offset manager and are the only
>> patches
>> that I propose for mainline inclusion.
>> Patches 5-8 clean up drm_mm and are informational-only. Daniel has similar
>> patches in i915-next and I will rebase them once it is merged. Ignore
>> them if you're not interested.
>> Patches 9-19 implement mmap access control. Comments are welcome! They are
>> intended for mainline inclusion, too, but probably require some more
>> review
>> rounds. I'd really appreciate if driver authors could comment on the
>> implementation.
>> Patch 20 shows the main motivation behind this whole series: render nodes.
>> It is
>> marked RFC and I will resend once the VMA manager is merged upstream. Feel
>> free
>> to test it.
>>
>> One more note regarding DRM-Master: Render-clients are independent of
>> DRM-Master
>> (see the DocBook documentation). It really doesn't make sense to
>> create/bind a
>> DRM-Master object to render-clients. However, a lot of core DRM code
>> depends on
>>   ->master != NULL. Drivers need to take care not to call into those core
>> modules
>> if they implement DRIVER_RENDER.
>> I plan on removing multiple-master-support in the next series. So there
>> will be
>> only one global master and each open-file is bound to it. This will make
>> it very
>> easy to phase out "drm_master". The planned "modeset" nodes provide a nice
>> replacement. If anyone knows a **currently used** use-case for
>> multiple-masters,
>> please tell me. I couldn't find one that _actually works_.
>> (SetMaster+DropMaster
>> will obviously stay functional even with drm_master removed).
>>
>>
>> (series available at: https://github.com/dvdhrm/linux/tree/rnodes)
>>
>> Comments welcome!
>> Cheers
>> David
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for this patchset. I am away from my computers for testing but I was
> wondering if you based your vma rework on Dave's implementation. If so,
> you may have the same bug that I had with it.
>
> I cannot remember the details of the bug, but I could trigger it by
> rebooting
> kde around 13 times on radeon. I didn't have this problem with Nouveau.

It is based on Dave's code, but I rewrote all of it and fixed several
bugs. For instance, there was a TTM ref-count leak for BOs in TTM core
and a TTM locking issue. I didn't encounter any bugs so far, but I
didn't try to restart the xserver 13 times. I will do some more
stress-tests, but it is quite likely you hit one of those two bugs
with radeon.

> I am not competent to judge this work but I will try to test it and check
> with my security tests that I wrote that the problem is indeed solved
> on nouveau and radeon.

The changes are actually quite simple. I intentionally kept TTM
locking as it was before, even though I think we could reduce it now.
Anyway, I will resend v3 (which now includes tegra and staging) this
weekend. Hopefully we can get it into linux-next soon.

Thanks!
David

> Looking forward to seeing your proposition for the userspace :)
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux