Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amdgpu: Merge debug module parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.08.23 um 14:34 schrieb André Almeida:
Em 25/08/2023 09:29, Christian König escreveu:
Am 25.08.23 um 14:24 schrieb André Almeida:
Em 25/08/2023 03:56, Christian König escreveu:
> Am 24.08.23 um 18:25 schrieb André Almeida:
>> Merge all developer debug options available as separated module
>> parameters in one, making it obvious that are for developers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c  | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h |  9 +++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> index f5856b82605e..d53e4097acc0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>> @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ int amdgpu_use_xgmi_p2p = 1;
>>   int amdgpu_vcnfw_log;
>>   int amdgpu_sg_display = -1; /* auto */
>>   int amdgpu_user_partt_mode = AMDGPU_AUTO_COMPUTE_PARTITION_MODE;
>> +uint amdgpu_debug_mask;
>>   static void amdgpu_drv_delayed_reset_work_handler(struct work_struct
>> *work);
>> @@ -938,6 +939,9 @@ module_param_named(user_partt_mode,
>> amdgpu_user_partt_mode, uint, 0444);
>>   module_param(enforce_isolation, bool, 0444);
>>   MODULE_PARM_DESC(enforce_isolation, "enforce process isolation
>> between graphics and compute . enforce_isolation = on");
>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug_mask, "debug options for amdgpu, disabled by
>> default");
>> +module_param_named(debug_mask, amdgpu_debug_mask, uint, 0444);
>> +
>>   /* These devices are not supported by amdgpu.
>>    * They are supported by the mach64, r128, radeon drivers
>>    */
>> @@ -2871,6 +2875,24 @@ static struct pci_driver amdgpu_kms_pci_driver = {
>>       .dev_groups = amdgpu_sysfs_groups,
>>   };
>> +static void amdgpu_init_debug_options(void)
>> +{
>> +    if (amdgpu_debug_mask & DEBUG_VERBOSE_EVICTIONS) {
>> +        pr_info("debug: eviction debug messages enabled\n");
>> +        debug_evictions = true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (amdgpu_debug_mask & DEBUG_VM) {
>> +        pr_info("debug: VM handling debug enabled\n");
>> +        amdgpu_vm_debug = true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (amdgpu_debug_mask & DEBUG_LARGEBAR) {
>> +        pr_info("debug: enabled simulating large-bar capability on
>> non-large bar system\n");
>> +        debug_largebar = true;
>
> How should that work???

Ops, I thought it was a boolean. It should be

+        debug_largebar = 1;


That's not the problem, the question is since when do we have a debug_largebar option and what should that one do?


It should work exactly like the other one, but instead of using amdgpu.large_bar=1, one would use amdgpu.debug_mask=0x4 to activate it, as the plan is to merge all current debug options in a single one right?

Ah! That's the KFD debug_largebar option! Now I got what this is.

Probably best to move the booleans into amdgpu_device and deprecate the old options.

Not really a good approach to overwrite the globals here.

Regards,
Christian.


Regards,
Christian.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux