Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/shmem-helper: Make pages_use_count an atomic_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/11/23 16:08, Steven Price wrote:
> On 09/08/2023 17:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> This way we can grab a pages ref without acquiring the resv lock when
>> pages_use_count > 0. Need to implement asynchronous map using the
> 
> NIT: s/Need/This is needed/
> 
>> drm_gpuva_mgr when the map/unmap operation triggers a mapping split,
>> requiring the new left/right regions to grab an additional page ref
>> to guarantee that the pages stay pinned when the middle section is
>> unmapped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c  | 28 +++++++++++++------------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c         |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c |  2 +-
>>  include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h      |  2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> index a783d2245599..ca6938ea1b82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>  		if (shmem->pages)
>>  			drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(shmem);
>>  
>> -		drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, shmem->pages_use_count);
>> +		drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, atomic_read(&shmem->pages_use_count));
>>  
>>  		dma_resv_unlock(shmem->base.resv);
>>  	}
>> @@ -172,14 +172,14 @@ static int drm_gem_shmem_get_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>  
>>  	dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
>>  
>> -	if (shmem->pages_use_count++ > 0)
>> +	if (atomic_inc_return(&shmem->pages_use_count) > 1)
>>  		return 0;
>>  
>>  	pages = drm_gem_get_pages(obj);
>>  	if (IS_ERR(pages)) {
>>  		drm_dbg_kms(obj->dev, "Failed to get pages (%ld)\n",
>>  			    PTR_ERR(pages));
>> -		shmem->pages_use_count = 0;
>> +		atomic_set(&shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
>>  		return PTR_ERR(pages);
>>  	}
>>  
>> @@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>  
>>  	dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
>>  
>> -	if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(obj->dev, !shmem->pages_use_count))
>> +	if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(obj->dev, !atomic_read(&shmem->pages_use_count)))
>>  		return;
>>  
>> -	if (--shmem->pages_use_count > 0)
>> +	if (atomic_dec_return(&shmem->pages_use_count) > 0)
>>  		return;
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> @@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ int drm_gem_shmem_pin(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>  
>>  	drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, obj->import_attach);
>>  
>> +	/* If we are the first owner, we need to grab the lock. */
>> +	if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&shmem->pages_use_count))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
> 
> Unless I'm misunderstanding I think this introduces a race where two
> threads call drm_gem_shmem_pin() at the same time:
> 
> Thread1				| Thread 2
> --------------------------------+------------------------------
> drm_gem_shmem_pin()		|
>  - pages_use_count == 0 so not  |
>    incremented                  |
>  - lock taken			|
> drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked()	|
> drm_gem_shmem_get_pages()	|
>  - pages_use_count incremented	|
> <thread descheduled>            | drm_gem_shmem_pin()
>                                 |  - pages_use_count == 1 so is it
> 				|    incremented and returns early
> 				|    without taking the lock
> 				| Code tries to use shmem->pages
> <thread rescheduled>		| and blows up
> drm_gem_get_pages()		|
> shmem->pages populated		|
> lock released			|
> 
> I think you need to modify drm_gem_shmem_get_pages() to only increment
> pages_use_count when shmem->pages has been populated. That also gets rid
> of the atomic_set() in that function which scares me.

This is correct, both pin() and get_pages() should use
atomic_inc_not_zero().

Note that we shouldn't use atomic functions open-coded, there is kref
helper for that which uses refcount_t underneath and has additional
checks/warnings for count underflow/overflow. I'm going to post patches
converting drm-shmem to kref around next week, Boris is aware about it
and we should then sync shrinker/panthor patchsets to the common
drm-shmem base.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux