On 8/11/23 16:08, Steven Price wrote:
> On 09/08/2023 17:53, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> This way we can grab a pages ref without acquiring the resv lock when
>> pages_use_count > 0. Need to implement asynchronous map using the
>
> NIT: s/Need/This is needed/
>
>> drm_gpuva_mgr when the map/unmap operation triggers a mapping split,
>> requiring the new left/right regions to grab an additional page ref
>> to guarantee that the pages stay pinned when the middle section is
>> unmapped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 28 +++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 2 +-
>> include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> index a783d2245599..ca6938ea1b82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>> if (shmem->pages)
>> drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(shmem);
>>
>> - drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, shmem->pages_use_count);
>> + drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, atomic_read(&shmem->pages_use_count));
>>
>> dma_resv_unlock(shmem->base.resv);
>> }
>> @@ -172,14 +172,14 @@ static int drm_gem_shmem_get_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>
>> dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
>>
>> - if (shmem->pages_use_count++ > 0)
>> + if (atomic_inc_return(&shmem->pages_use_count) > 1)
>> return 0;
>>
>> pages = drm_gem_get_pages(obj);
>> if (IS_ERR(pages)) {
>> drm_dbg_kms(obj->dev, "Failed to get pages (%ld)\n",
>> PTR_ERR(pages));
>> - shmem->pages_use_count = 0;
>> + atomic_set(&shmem->pages_use_count, 0);
>> return PTR_ERR(pages);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -210,10 +210,10 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>
>> dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
>>
>> - if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(obj->dev, !shmem->pages_use_count))
>> + if (drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(obj->dev, !atomic_read(&shmem->pages_use_count)))
>> return;
>>
>> - if (--shmem->pages_use_count > 0)
>> + if (atomic_dec_return(&shmem->pages_use_count) > 0)
>> return;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> @@ -263,6 +263,10 @@ int drm_gem_shmem_pin(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
>>
>> drm_WARN_ON(obj->dev, obj->import_attach);
>>
>> + /* If we are the first owner, we need to grab the lock. */
>> + if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&shmem->pages_use_count))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>
> Unless I'm misunderstanding I think this introduces a race where two
> threads call drm_gem_shmem_pin() at the same time:
>
> Thread1 | Thread 2
> --------------------------------+------------------------------
> drm_gem_shmem_pin() |
> - pages_use_count == 0 so not |
> incremented |
> - lock taken |
> drm_gem_shmem_pin_locked() |
> drm_gem_shmem_get_pages() |
> - pages_use_count incremented |
> <thread descheduled> | drm_gem_shmem_pin()
> | - pages_use_count == 1 so is it
> | incremented and returns early
> | without taking the lock
> | Code tries to use shmem->pages
> <thread rescheduled> | and blows up
> drm_gem_get_pages() |
> shmem->pages populated |
> lock released |
>
> I think you need to modify drm_gem_shmem_get_pages() to only increment
> pages_use_count when shmem->pages has been populated. That also gets rid
> of the atomic_set() in that function which scares me.
This is correct, both pin() and get_pages() should use
atomic_inc_not_zero().
Note that we shouldn't use atomic functions open-coded, there is kref
helper for that which uses refcount_t underneath and has additional
checks/warnings for count underflow/overflow. I'm going to post patches
converting drm-shmem to kref around next week, Boris is aware about it
and we should then sync shrinker/panthor patchsets to the common
drm-shmem base.
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
