On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 09:41:50AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 05:24:09PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > > > From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Document the Anbernic RG351V panel, which appears to be identical to > > > the panel used in their 353 series except for in inclusion of an > > > additional DSI format flag. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml | 18 ++++++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > > > index 116c1b6030a2..576f3640cb33 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/newvision,nv3051d.yaml > > > @@ -7,9 +7,7 @@ $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > title: NewVision NV3051D based LCD panel > > > > > > description: | > > > - The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels. For now, > > > - this driver only supports the 640x480 panels found in the Anbernic RG353 > > > - based devices. > > > + The NewVision NV3051D is a driver chip used to drive DSI panels. > > > > > > maintainers: > > > - Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > @@ -19,11 +17,15 @@ allOf: > > > > > > properties: > > > compatible: > > > - items: > > > - - enum: > > > - - anbernic,rg353p-panel > > > - - anbernic,rg353v-panel > > > - - const: newvision,nv3051d > > > + oneOf: > > > + - items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - anbernic,rg353p-panel > > > + - anbernic,rg353v-panel > > > + - const: newvision,nv3051d > > > + > > > + - items: > > > + - const: anbernic,rg351v-panel > > > > I don't understand. Is this panel not based on newvision,nv3051d? If > > not, then it probably should be a different binding. Lot's of panel > > bindings have similar properties. > > It appears to be the same panel (or extremely similar, honestly I don't > know because there are no external markings on it). However, this > specific implementation seems to require MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS, > not using it prevents the panel from working. As for the existing panel > MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS stops it from working. The different > binding essentially determines whether or not that flag is present, but > otherwise everything else is identical. > > Chris If this is not correct I could also change it so instead there is a property that toggles the MIPI_DSI_CLOCK_NON_CONTINUOUS flag, something like "newvision,clk_non_continuous". Again aside from this flag the panel itself is identical to the one already supported by this driver. Thank you, Chris > > > > > Rob
