Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use drm_mm_remove_node instead of put_block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > drm_mm_remove_node() does unlink the node but not remove it. Btw., I
>> > have these fixes in my series, too. I will push it later and write the
>> > git-link to #dri-devel.
>>
>> We have patches in-flight to convert over to embedded drm_mm_nodes anyway,
>> so I guess that part will solve itself automatically.
>
> I'm planning to get this out ASAP. I'm a bit confused now though what I
> actually need to send.

I think for now just the top-down allocator + the create_node stuff
for stolen memory. I guess the conversion to embed the gtt_space
drm_mm_node will take a bit longer.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux