Comment # 11
on bug 65873
from Tom Stellard
(In reply to comment #10) > I've got a draft fix in my libclc repo on fdo.o. I've tested for > regressions on Cedar (successfully), and I will test on SI with your 64-bit > load patch asap (hopefully tonight, but we'll see). I took a look at your libclc fix, and I realized that we can't use address space qualifiers in common code, because addrspace(1) may not mean global address space on all targets. I think you might find that the optimizers are good enough to turn a .cl implementation into optimal code, but if not we may be have to move the LLVM IR implementations into target specific code.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
