Op 26-06-13 04:14, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> From: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The drm_gem_mmap_obj() has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex,
> but some caller functions do not. So it adds mutex lock to missing
> callers and adds WARN_ON assertion whether drm_gem_mmap_obj() is
> called with mutex lock or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch is based on drm-next branch.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 4321713..b19bba0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -661,6 +661,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vm_close);
> * the GEM object is not looked up based on its fake offset. To implement the
> * DRM mmap operation, drivers should use the drm_gem_mmap() function.
> *
> + * NOTE: This function has to be protected with dev->struct_mutex
> + *
> * Return 0 or success or -EINVAL if the object size is smaller than the VMA
> * size, or if no gem_vm_ops are provided.
> */
> @@ -669,6 +671,8 @@ int drm_gem_mmap_obj(struct drm_gem_object *obj, unsigned long obj_size,
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
>
> + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex));
>
Please don't use mutex_is_locked, use lockdep_assert_held, so the cost only exists when PROVE_LOCKING is used..
I know some current code does it wrong, but that is the correct function to use.
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
