On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:27:40PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote: > So I'd like to ask for other DRM maintainers. How do you think about it? it > seems like that Intel DRM (maintained by Daniel), OMAP DRM (maintained by > Rob) and GEM CMA helper also have same issue Russell pointed out. I think > not only the above approach but also the performance is very important. CMA uses coherent memory to back their buffers, though that might not be true of memory obtained from other drivers via dma_buf. Plus, there is no support in the CMA helper for exporting or importng these buffers. I guess Intel i915 is only used on x86, which is a coherent platform and requires no cache maintanence for DMA. OMAP DRM does not support importing non-DRM buffers buffers back into DRM. Moreover, it will suffer from the problems I described if any attempt is made to write to the buffer after it has been re-imported. Lastly, I should point out that the dma_buf stuff is really only useful when you need to export a dma buffer from one driver and import it into another driver - for example to pass data from a camera device driver to a display device driver. It shouldn't be used within a single driver as a means of passing buffers between userspace and kernel space. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
