On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Most graphics cards nowadays have a multiple of this limit as their vram, so
> limiting GART doesn't seem to make much sense.
Pushed, thanks :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten >Lnkhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> index 3a5e19a..41ddecd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> @@ -168,9 +168,6 @@ nouveau_gart_manager_new(struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man,
> struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = nouveau_bo(bo);
> struct nouveau_mem *node;
>
> - if (unlikely((mem->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >= 512 * 1024 * 1024))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> node = kzalloc(sizeof(*node), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!node)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -406,8 +403,6 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> /* GART init */
> if (drm->agp.stat != ENABLED) {
> drm->gem.gart_available = nouveau_vmmgr(drm->device)->limit;
> - if (drm->gem.gart_available > 512 * 1024 * 1024)
> - drm->gem.gart_available = 512 * 1024 * 1024;
> } else {
> drm->gem.gart_available = drm->agp.size;
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
