Hi Neil,
Thank you for reviewing the patch.
On 16-May-23 12:51, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> On 15/05/2023 17:59, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>> Hi Tomi,
>>
>> On 12-May-23 14:45, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2023 12:30, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
>>>> From: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@xxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> With new connector model, mhdp bridge will not create the connector and
>>>> SoC driver will rely on format negotiation to setup the encoder format.
>>>>
>>>> Support minimal format negotiations hooks in the drm_bridge_funcs.
>>>> Complete format negotiation can be added based on EDID data.
>>>> This patch adds the minimal required support to avoid failure
>>>> after moving to new connector model.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@xxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
>>>
>>> You need to add your SoB to this and the other patches.
>>
>> Okay!
>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Notes:
>>>>
>>>> changes from v1:
>>>> * cosmetic fixes, commit message update.
>>>>
>>>> changes from v5:
>>>> * dropped the default_bus_format variable and directly assigned
>>>> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB121212_1X36 to input_fmts.
>>>>
>>>> .../drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c | 25
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
>>>> index f6822dfa3805..623e4235c94f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/cdns-mhdp8546-core.c
>>>> @@ -2146,6 +2146,30 @@ cdns_mhdp_bridge_atomic_reset(struct drm_bridge
>>>> *bridge)
>>>> return &cdns_mhdp_state->base;
>>>> }
>>>> +static u32 *cdns_mhdp_get_input_bus_fmts(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
>>>> + struct drm_bridge_state *bridge_state,
>>>> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>>>> + struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
>>>> + u32 output_fmt,
>>>> + unsigned int *num_input_fmts)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u32 *input_fmts;
>>>> +
>>>> + *num_input_fmts = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (output_fmt != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED)
>>>> + return NULL;
>>>
>>> The tfp410 and sii902x drivers don't have the above check. Why does mhdp
>>> need it? Or the other way, why don't tfp410 and sii902x need it?
>>
>> I had removed this condition in order to follow status quo, from the
>> ITE-66121 HDMI bridge driver.
>>
>> The idea would have been to drop this for MHDP as well, but I guess I
>> overlooked this one.
>>
>> However...
>>
>>> I guess at the moment we always do get MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED as the out
>>> fmt (in all three bridge drivers), don't we?
>>
>> ... I tested again to ensure that the above is indeed the case. And
>> ended up catching some odd behavior.
>>
>> It turns out that for all the HDMI bridges (TFP410, SII902X, ITE-66121),
>> the format negotiation doesn't stop at output_fmt = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.
>> The {bridge}_get_input_format API gets called again with the output_fmt
>> = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB24_1X24.
>>
>> This doesn't happen with the MHDP driver. Format negotiation with MHDP
>> bridge stops after one round, at output_fmt = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.
>
> This is because the bridge negociation logic will test with all possible
> output formats from the chain, and won't stop at first working test.
>
Okay..
> If your bridge only supports a single input format, it should return the
> same format whatever output_fmt is tried.
>
> So indeed remove this test on mhdp aswell, or filter out invalid output
> formats.
Agreed.
I have been looking into the code deeper and trying to understand the
logic flow around the format negotiation in the framework. Here are the
2 points that I want to mention. Please let me know if I have missed
something with my understanding.
Firstly, the mhdp-8546 output connects to the display-connector (with
the compatible, "dp-connector") in the devicetree.
When the negotiation begins at 'drm_atomic_bridge_chain_select_bus_fmts'
the display-connector bridge *should* act as the 'last_bridge', and the
atomic_get_output_bus_fmts hook of the display-connector should get
called. However, for some reason I am not yet sure of, the condition
:: if (last_bridge->funcs->atomic_get_output_bus_fmts)
fails and the 'select_bus_fmt_recursive' function gets called instead,
(with MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED as output_fmt), which in turn calls the
atomic_get_input_bus_fmts hook of the mhdp-8546. This entirely skips the
display-connector out of the format negotiation.
This doesn't happen when the HDMI bridges are in concern, even though,
they too are connected with display-connector (with compatible
"hdmi-connector").
I looked into the display-connector driver hoping to find if the 2 types
of connectors are being treated differently wrt format negotiation, but
I did not find any clue.
Please let me know if you have any idea about this.
Secondly, as mentioned in the display-connector driver, this bridge is
essentially a pass-through. And hence to reflect that, both the format
negotiation hooks of display-connector driver call their counter-parts
from the previous bridge if they are available, and if not, the formats
are assigned MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.
While this makes sense for the atomic_get_output_bus_fmts hook, it seems
to me that, the same may not hold true for the atomic_get_input_bus_fmts
hook.
If the bridge is indeed a pass-through, should it not also pass the
output_format as its input format (which it actually got from the output
of previous bridge)?
This way all the following will remain same.
1. output_fmt of prev_bridge,
2. input_fmt of display-connector, and
3. output_fmt of display-connector.
Currently, since the atomic_get_input_bus_fmts hook of display-connector
calls its counter-part from the prev_bridge, the input_fmt it passes
(for HDMI bridges) is MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24. The
atomic_get_ouput_bus_fmts hook of the HDMI bridge has to, then, set an
input bus format considering MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 as its output
instead of MEDIA_BUS_FMT_FIXED.
Let me know what you think!
Regards
Aradhya
