On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/06/13 17:58, Rob Clark wrote:
>
>> could be udev or something else was triggering the module to load?
>> Not 100% sure offhand.
>
> Well in my case I load them manually. But if there are applications out
> there, that at the moment use drmOpen("omapdrm"), then the change would
> break those apps.
well, drmOpen("omapdrm") shouldn't currently work
>>> Why do you "need" drmOpen("omap")? Is it just a convention to use that
>>> kind of name, instead of "omapdrm" style name?
>>
>> all of the /dev/dri/cardN get opened, and then DRM_IOCTL_VERSION ioctl
>> to get the driver name/version, which is compared against the name
>> passed in to drmOpen(). So drmOpen("omapdrm") shouldn't really work
>
> Ok, so normally nobody will call drmOpen("omapdrm") explicitly, but
> somebody (X?) will just do what you described to get the modules loaded?
> If so, I guess it's unlikely that there would be an app with
> drmOpen("omapdrm").
>
> Of course, we could also rename the name returned via DRM_IOCTL_VERSION
> to be "omapdrm", right? But looking at the names of other drivers,
> "omap" is probably better.
changing the name would also be an abi break ;-)
BR,
-R
> Tomi
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
