On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:23:33 -0400 Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Note also that the generic DRM KMS code assumes cursor support at > > 64x64, and there's no generic way for a driver at present (that I know > > of) to inform it of anything different. > > It shouldn't be too hard to add a new cap for querying the cursor size > to the drm cap interface. There was already a patch request for that, but the functions were surely useless. Otherwise, you may do a search on "largest cursor:" (xdpyinfo output). The results are surprising.. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
