The DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro has implementation for protecting the
read/write file operations from removal race conditions. This further
enables using debugfs_create_file_unsafe() function since there is no need
for a proxy file operations struct for protection. Hence replace the
DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE macro by DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE and the
debugfs_create_file() by the lightweight debugfs_create_file_unsafe()
versions.
This issue was identified using the coccinelle debugfs_simple_attr.cocci
semantic patch.
Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Please note: The changes are compile tested only.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
index 9f1c209d9251..a45a43c35a6b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c
@@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set(void *data, u64 val)
return 0;
}
-DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
- vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
- "0x%llx\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops,
+ vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_get, vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_set,
+ "0x%llx\n");
/**
* intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu - register debugfs entries for a vGPU
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ void intel_gvt_debugfs_add_vgpu(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu)
debugfs_create_bool("active", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, &vgpu->active);
debugfs_create_file("mmio_diff", 0444, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
&vgpu_mmio_diff_fops);
- debugfs_create_file("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
- &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
+ debugfs_create_file_unsafe("scan_nonprivbb", 0644, vgpu->debugfs, vgpu,
+ &vgpu_scan_nonprivbb_fops);
}
/**
--
2.34.1
