On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 02:19:07PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello Conor, > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:11:51AM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > TL;DR, I quite like the ability to return an error and not mislead the > > caller. > > Is this an Ack? It is if you want it to be! I didn't really feel qualified to do so which is why I gave some context etc. I did check out the callsites for the non-void returning op, and it looked good to me, so sure, why not: Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Conor.
