Comment # 18
on bug 63579
from Ian Romanick
(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > Making the support general (instead of just for preprocessor directives) > > simplified the code greatly. Since I'm responsible for maintaining this > > code base as my job, that's a strong incentive for me. > > I'm sorry if this is a bit blunt, but wow. That's one of the least appealing > arguments I've heard in a long time. Not only is someone paying you for your > time, you think that's a *justification* for not supporting the standard? > That's pretty much the oppositte of how this usually works. > > So, as a paying customer of Intel, where would I file a bug-report that > Intel will deal with in a responsible way? What are you talking about? This game works on the i965 driver. I'm sorry that you don't think the maintainability of a multimillion line code base is an appealing argument.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
