Op vrijdag 12 april 2013 14:47 schreef Chris Wilson: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:24:43PM +0200, Ben Mesman wrote: > > Last year, a patch was made for the "HP t5740e Thin Client" (see > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2012-May/023245.html). > > This device reports an lvds panel, but does not really have one. > > > > The predecessor of this device is the "hp t5740", which also does not > > have an lvds panel. This patch will add the same quirk for this device. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Mesman <ben@xxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c > > index ca2d903..8a56d9b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c > > @@ -816,6 +816,14 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_no_lvds[] = > { > > }, > > { > > .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, > > + .ident = "Hewlett-Packard hp t5740", > > + .matches = { > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Hewlett- > Packard"), > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "hp t5740"), > > + }, > > + }, > > One thing to note is that the dmi matching routine uses strstr (as opposed to > dmi_match() which uses strcmp!) so this rule should encompass the > following rule for its offspring. I am sorry, I don't know what you are asking here. Is there something wrong with this patch? -- Regards, Ben Mesman. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
