Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/msm/dsi: add a helper method to compute the dsi byte clk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/10/2022 01:22, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 10/27/2022 10:35 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 22/09/2022 03:49, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Re-arrange the dsi_calc_pclk method to two helpers, one to
compute the DSI byte clk and the other to compute the pclk.

This makes the separation of the two clean and also allows
clients to compute and use the dsi byte clk separately.

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h      |  2 ++
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
index 2a96b4fe7839..60ba8e67f550 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi.h
@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ int dsi_link_clk_enable_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
  int dsi_link_clk_enable_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
  void dsi_link_clk_disable_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
  void dsi_link_clk_disable_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
+unsigned long dsi_byte_clk_get_rate(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, bool is_bonded_dsi,
+        const struct drm_display_mode *mode);
  int dsi_tx_buf_alloc_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, int size);
  int dsi_tx_buf_alloc_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, int size);
  void *dsi_tx_buf_get_6g(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
index 57a4c0fa614b..32b35d4ac1d3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
@@ -569,9 +569,8 @@ void dsi_link_clk_disable_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
      clk_disable_unprepare(msm_host->byte_clk);
  }
-static unsigned long dsi_get_pclk_rate(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi) +static unsigned long dsi_get_pclk_rate(const struct drm_display_mode *mode, bool is_bonded_dsi)
  {
-    struct drm_display_mode *mode = msm_host->mode;
      unsigned long pclk_rate;
      pclk_rate = mode->clock * 1000;
@@ -588,12 +587,18 @@ static unsigned long dsi_get_pclk_rate(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bo
      return pclk_rate;
  }
-static void dsi_calc_pclk(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi) +unsigned long dsi_byte_clk_get_rate(struct mipi_dsi_host *host, bool is_bonded_dsi,
+        const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
  {
+    struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host = to_msm_dsi_host(host);
      u8 lanes = msm_host->lanes;
      u32 bpp = dsi_get_bpp(msm_host->format);
-    unsigned long pclk_rate = dsi_get_pclk_rate(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
-    u64 pclk_bpp = (u64)pclk_rate * bpp;
+    unsigned long pclk_rate;
+    u64 pclk_bpp;
+
+    pclk_rate = dsi_get_pclk_rate(mode, is_bonded_dsi);
+
+    pclk_bpp = (u64)pclk_rate * bpp;
      if (lanes == 0) {
          pr_err("%s: forcing mdss_dsi lanes to 1\n", __func__);
@@ -606,8 +611,14 @@ static void dsi_calc_pclk(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
      else
          do_div(pclk_bpp, (8 * lanes));
-    msm_host->pixel_clk_rate = pclk_rate;
-    msm_host->byte_clk_rate = pclk_bpp;
+    return pclk_bpp;
+}
+
+static void dsi_calc_pclk(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
+{
+    msm_host->pixel_clk_rate = dsi_get_pclk_rate(msm_host->mode, is_bonded_dsi); +    msm_host->byte_clk_rate = dsi_byte_clk_get_rate(&msm_host->base, is_bonded_dsi,
+            msm_host->mode);

This way you are calling dsi_get_pclk_rate twice(), which is slightly inefficient. You can call it once (here) and then pass the resulting pclk_rate as an argument to dsi_byte_clk_get_rate().

So the goal was to have two independent APIs to calculate byte and pixel clk.

If we pass the output of one as the input to the other we are making them dependent.

Thats why i kept it separate.

Calling one function from another clearly points that they are not independent. And surely pixel and byte clocks can not be fully independent. I see your point about getting only the byte clock. But I think it would be easier to explicitly pass the pixel rate rather than calculating it again under the hood.



      DBG("pclk=%lu, bclk=%lu", msm_host->pixel_clk_rate,
                  msm_host->byte_clk_rate);
@@ -635,7 +646,7 @@ int dsi_calc_clk_rate_v2(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
      dsi_calc_pclk(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi);
-    pclk_bpp = (u64)dsi_get_pclk_rate(msm_host, is_bonded_dsi) * bpp;
+    pclk_bpp = (u64)dsi_get_pclk_rate(msm_host->mode, is_bonded_dsi) * bpp;

So... We have calculated all rates, stored the pclk_rate in msm_host->pixel_clk_rate. And now we are going to calculate it again. As you are touching this line of code, I'd suggest to just use msm_host->pixel_clk_rate instead of a function call.

Ack, I will fix this.


      do_div(pclk_bpp, 8);
      msm_host->src_clk_rate = pclk_bpp;


--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux