Re: radeonsi tiling dilema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So i am facing a dilema regarding tiling on radeonsi. Given that we now have a fixed table of tiling mode this put more pressure on the kernel userspace api. I see either 2 solutions.

Enforce kernel to set at fixed index in the table best tiling mode for given gpu for given format, such as DEPTH32_2D_4AA at index 4, or COLOR_SCANOUT_2D at index 13 ... that way kernel can still adapt the tile mode array value. Note that this match the design behind the tile mode index being that there is a limited number of useful tile mode combination and for each surface format  (depth/color/macro tile/micro/tile) there is a best one.
Second solution is to add an ioctl to compute mipmap information in kernel (pitch alignment slice size ...) based on format, size of the surface.

Well that one can also be slightly modified to not strictly enfore index association with surface format/type preference.
 

Some might argue that we could just export the table content to userspace, but that would loose information and possibly froze the tile mode table forever as API. The information we loose is what index match to prefered surface format/type combination. And the tile mode might be considered API as if kernel ever change what userspace expect then we might break some userspace.


Thought, idea ?

Cheers,
Jerome

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux