Comment # 11
on bug 62226
from Christian König
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > I am against this sort of patches. > > > > > > > Can you explain why? > > Because you are working against aboll and me - we want to build as much > '-shared' as possible (and also distributions [should] want to do so): > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-March/036449.html > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-March/036493.html > > Also this statement is wrong: > "This library was originally changed to a shared object to work around > linker error in egl_static.so, but these appear to be fixed now." > > It was changed to be built '-shared' because there were and possibly be > troubles with crashing egl things if r600 AND radeonsi were built together > (see on #dri-devel from mid december 2012 [MrCooper, jobermayr]) > > You should also see the conditional there. If it makes sense and is required > (r600 AND radeonsi) it is shared. If it doesn't (r600 XOR radeonsi) it is > static. I don't think I like the general idea here, for most distributions driver size doesn't matter so much, but on the other hand it is highly likely that we want to have different version of this and other libs for r600 and radeonsi. Christian.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
