Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:49:24 +0100
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <514F3F57.5080407@gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Lijo Antony <lijo.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lucas Stach <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>, nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20130304211608.GD22274@pd.tnic> <1362501052.1933.2.camel@antimon> <20130319202432.GC4570@pd.tnic> <1363725620.3413.29.camel@thor.lan> <5149589D.6090403@gmail.com> <5149D467.7030908@gmail.com> <20130320152948.GD15471@pd.tnic> <514F3F57.5080407@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:00:55PM +0400, Lijo Antony wrote:
> Looks like this has been fixed in -rc4.

Yep, it seems so here too.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

References:
- nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Lucas Stach
- Re: nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Peter Hurley
- Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Lijo Antony
- Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Lijo Antony
- Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Borislav Petkov
- Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
  - From: Lijo Antony

Prev by Date: Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
Next by Date: [Bug 62696] [r300g, bisected] Around 50 piglit vs variable-indexing tests fails after "glsl_to_tgsi: allocate arrays separately v2"
Previous by thread: Re: [Nouveau] nouveau lockdep splat
Next by thread: Re: nouveau lockdep splat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]