On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Dylan Semler <dylan.semler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Dylan Semler <dylan.semler@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Oops. I neglected to preface this with my motivation: I have a new >> > monitor that doesn't report its native resolution in its EDID block. It >> > seemed to me this calls for an EDID quirk, but the current quirk >> > infrastructure doesn't allow explicitly creating new modes. So I set >> > out >> > to make a simple enhancement to allow specifying a new mode and then >> > setting it as preferred. >> > >> >> That's odd. Maybe it's actually in an extension block or something like >> that? > > Yeah, I agree. According to edid-decode /sys/class/drm/card0-HDMI-A-1/edid > there's one extension block, but none of those modes are the native > resolution > either. Hm, we only recently added support for E-EDID (i.e. more than 1 extension block). Have you checked whether latest kernels fare better? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
