On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > If *userspace* doesn't request either IOC_IN | IOC_OUT in their ioctl >> > command (which are seperate from the ioctl number), then kdata is set to >> > NULL. >> >> Doesn't that mean that we need these checks everywhere? Or at least a >> fixup in drm core proper? > > That's my conclusion. We either add a flag to ask drm_ioctl to prevent > passing NULL pointers (as the existing behaviour may be useful > somewhere, and I have not checked all callees) or saturate our callbacks > with NULL checks. Do we have the kernel's expected IOC_IN/IOC_OUT flags at that point as well? we could check them and block NULL in that case. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
