Comment # 59
on bug 60802
from Alexandre Demers
Alex, a couple of things changed in your last attachment. You removed the L2T part, you reverted the "non_disp = 2" back to "non_disp = 1" and changed the binary offset for 28 (instead of 27). Am I right to understand you set "non_disp" back to 1 because your are offsetting one more bit (according to your comment in v2)? If that's right, I don't see how v3 is different from v2 except for the L2T change. And since non_disp=1 is not set at all in the main branch, how would that fix the corruption problem. Aren't we back to v0 for the L2T path (which is broken) and to v2 for the T2L path (which is also not better)?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel