Comment # 3
on bug 61747
from Chris Rankin
WTF? According to glxinfo, it's not using r600g at all...?!?! $ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib64 glxinfo name of display: :1 libGL: screen 0 does not appear to be DRI2 capable libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/local/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so libGL error: dlopen /usr/local/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so failed (/usr/local/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast display: :1 screen: 0 direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose) OpenGL vendor string: VMware, Inc. OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 0x301) OpenGL version string: 1.4 (2.1 Mesa 9.0.1) It can't find swrast_dri.so because I didn't compile it, but r600g_dri.so is definitely there! Fedora's gnome-shell process has suspiciously switched to swrast_dri.so too. I have no idea what has just happened.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
