On 28 February 2013 00:02, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:27:30PM +0000, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: >> On 26 February 2013 18:11, James Courtier-Dutton <james.dutton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 26 February 2013 17:35, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 07:45:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 02:32:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: >> >>> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 04:06:02PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >>> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> > > > Hi Ben, >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > My Macbook Pro Retina fails to resume properly on 3.8. I tracked this >> >>> > > > down to commit 6c5a04249d7afeea3e0ed971e7813f84e29a1706 (drm/nvd0/disp: >> >>> > > > move link training helpers into core as display methods) >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Anything I can try to help solve this? >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Note, I'm using the Intel driver as the main controller for this laptop, >> >>> > > > well, I think I am, my xorg log is attached. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > No you are using the nvidia, the efi always boots nvidia enabled now. >> >>> > >> >>> > Really? When did that change? I thought I wanted to be using the Intel >> >>> > chip to save battery life. >> >>> > >> >>> > > btw I just tested my drm-next tree on mine and it resumed the display >> >>> > > fine, something oopsed a few seconds later that I haven't tracked down >> >>> > > >> >>> > > git://git.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I'll be sending it to Linus this evening or tomorrow morning, once I >> >>> > > fix my tree. >> >>> > >> >>> > Ok, I'll test again when it hits Linus's tree, and if that works, it >> >>> > would be good to try to work out what patch fixes it to get them into >> >>> > the 3.8-stable series so that others don't run into the same problem. >> >>> >> >>> I've tested Linus's tree now (I'm guessing it has all of your changes in >> >>> it), and it works! >> >>> >> >>> I see a bunch of patches marked for the stable branch, so I'll try those >> >>> out and see if they fix the problem. If not, I'll let you and Ben know. >> >> >> >> I've applied the radeon patches tagged for -stable and tested that on >> >> 3.8.0, but that doesn't solve the resume problem. Any ideas of anything >> >> else I can do to test this? Doing a "backwards" git-bisect is a pain, >> >> but I guess I can do that to try to track down what patch fixed this, if >> >> that's the only idea people have... >> >> >> > >> > If it helps, I have a similar resume problem here. >> > 3.7.8 good >> > 3.8.0 bad >> > >> > Laptop with no nvidia, no amd graphics, just Intel Graphics 4000, 3rd >> > Gen I5 CPU. >> >> Problem: "Backlight not coming on after resume." >> git finally bisected for my Samsung Serial 7 Laptop. >> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 0 steps) >> [cf0a6584aa6d382f802f2c3cacac23ccbccde0cd] drm/i915: write backlight >> harder <- This is the problem commit. Seems that fixing some >> machines breaks others, based on the existing comments on that patch. > > Hm, so, 3.8.0 works for you, but 3.8.1-rc1 doesn't? Or are you saying > Linus's tree doesn't work for you? > > As you have a different issue here than the nvidia hardware I was > dealing with, you might want to try to start over with a new thread and > the needed info, and the needed people on it (i.e. the i915 > maintainers and mailing list.) > I little confusing sorry. I started using: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git For that 3.7.8 worked fine, 3.8 failed to restore X, but the backlight lights. I then moved to linus tree at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git On Linus tree the problem commit is: [cf0a6584aa6d382f802f2c3cacac23ccbccde0cd] drm/i915: write backlight harder The problem on the Linux tree is different from the stable tree. Linus tree: Backlight fails to light up after resume. linux-stable tree: Failed to restore X, but the backlight lights. So, I think the linus tree fixes the "failed to restore X" bit, but introduced a new regression for the backlight. I don't know which patch from the Linus tree would fix the stable 3.8 tree. I will send an email to the i915 maintainers tomorrow. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel