Ping. On 2013-02-18 16:09, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > On 2013-01-25 11:01, Steffen Trumtrar wrote: > >> +/* VESA display monitor timing parameters */ >> +#define VESA_DMT_HSYNC_LOW BIT(0) >> +#define VESA_DMT_HSYNC_HIGH BIT(1) >> +#define VESA_DMT_VSYNC_LOW BIT(2) >> +#define VESA_DMT_VSYNC_HIGH BIT(3) >> + >> +/* display specific flags */ >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_LOW BIT(0) /* data enable flag */ >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DE_HIGH BIT(1) >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_POSEDGE BIT(2) /* drive data on pos. edge */ >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE BIT(3) /* drive data on neg. edge */ >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_INTERLACED BIT(4) >> +#define DISPLAY_FLAGS_DOUBLESCAN BIT(5) > > <snip> > >> + unsigned int dmt_flags; /* VESA DMT flags */ >> + unsigned int data_flags; /* video data flags */ > > Why did you go for this approach? To be able to represent > true/false/not-specified? > > Would it be simpler to just have "flags" field? What does it give us to > have those two separately? > > Should the above say raising edge/falling edge instead of positive > edge/negative edge? > > Tomi >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
