On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:15:54PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> + Linus
> + Marek
> + Laurent
> + Robert
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:40 AM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or
> > bridge")' attempted to simplify the case of expressing a simple panel
> > under a DSI controller, by assuming that the first non-graph child node
> > was a panel or bridge.
> >
> > Unfortunately for non-trivial cases the first child node might not be a
> > panel or bridge. Examples of this can be a aux-bus in the case of
> > DisplayPort, or an opp-table represented before the panel node.
> >
> > In these cases the reverted commit prevents the caller from ever finding
> > a reference to the panel.
> >
> > This reverts commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has
> > panel or bridge")', in favor of using an explicit graph reference to the
> > panel in the trivial case as well.
>
> This eventually breaks many child-based devm_drm_of_get_bridge
> switched drivers. Do you have any suggestions on how to proceed to
> succeed in those use cases as well?
I guess we could create a new helper for those, like
devm_drm_of_get_bridge_with_panel, or something.
Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
