> -----Original Message----- > From: Sachin Kamat [mailto:sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 5:03 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx; > s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; patches@xxxxxxxxxx; Ajay > Kumar > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/exynos: Add device tree based discovery > support for G2D > > On 6 February 2013 13:02, Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Looks good to me but please add document for it. > > Yes. I will. I was planning to send the bindings document patch along > with the dt patches (adding node entries to dts files). > Sylwester had suggested adding this to > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/ which contains other media > IPs. I think that it's better to go to gpu than media and we can divide Exynos IPs into the bellow categories, Media : mfc GPU : g2d, g3d, fimc, gsc Video : fimd, hdmi, eDP, MIPI-DSI And I think that the device-tree describes hardware so possibly, all documents in .../bindings/drm/exynos/* should be moved to proper place also. Please give me any opinions. Thanks, Inki Dae > > > > > To other guys, > > And is there anyone who know where this document should be added to? > > I'm not sure that the g2d document should be placed in > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu, media, drm/exynos or arm/exynos. > At > > least, this document should be shared with the g2d hw relevant drivers > such > > as v4l2 and drm. So is ".../bindings/gpu" proper place? > > > > > -- > With warm regards, > Sachin _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
