On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM, <j.glisse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We need to take reference on the sync object while holding the > fence spinlock but at the same time we don't want to allocate > memory while holding the spinlock. This patch make sure we > enforce both of this constraint. > > v2: actually test build it > > Fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906296 > > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx> Isn't that just another iteration of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1972071/ which somehow never reached -fixes? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
