On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 10:14:20AM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > 2013/02/01 9:53, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > >2013/02/01 9:50, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > >>2013/01/31 19:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:27:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > >>>>I forgot to change subject. So I resend a patch. > >>>> > >>>>--- > >>>>acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status. > >>>> > >>>>The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of > >>>>acpi_bus_get_device(). > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>>I've tried to apply this to drm-intel-next-queued, but git am didn't > >>>really like your patch - it failed to apply. Can you please rebase to the > >>>drm-intel-next-queued branch from > >>> > >>>git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel > >>> > >>>and please resubmit the patch, preferrably formatted with git > >>>format-patch? > >> > >>My mailer added a space in the patch. I updated the patch. > >>How abot it? > >> > >>--- > >>acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status. > >> > >>The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of > >>acpi_bus_get_device(). > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 2 +- > >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > >>index 7741c22..4d33874 100644 > >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > >>@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void intel_didl_outputs(struct drm_device *dev) > >> int i = 0; > >> > >> handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->pdev->dev); > >>- if (!handle || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))) > >>+ if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) > >> return; > >> > >> if (acpi_is_video_device(acpi_dev)) > >> > > > >Oops. My mailer added a space again... > >I'll check my mailer again. > > I do not understand why space was added to the patch. > So I attached the patch. Please check it. Yeah, worked this time. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel > > Thanks, > Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > > > >Thanks, > >Yasuaki Ishimatsu > > > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > >>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > acpi_bus_get_device() returns int not acpi_status. > > The patch change not to apply ACPI_FAILURE() to the return value of > acpi_bus_get_device(). > > Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > index 7741c22..4d33874 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static void intel_didl_outputs(struct drm_device *dev) > int i = 0; > > handle = DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE(&dev->pdev->dev); > - if (!handle || ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev))) > + if (!handle || acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev)) > return; > > if (acpi_is_video_device(acpi_dev)) > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
