Re: [PATCH v9 17/22] phy: phy-mtk-dp: Add driver for DP phy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 28/03/22 00:39, Guillaume Ranquet ha scritto:
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

This is a new driver that supports the integrated DisplayPort phy for
mediatek SoCs, especially the mt8195. The phy is integrated into the
DisplayPort controller and will be created by the mtk-dp driver. This
driver expects a struct regmap to be able to work on the same registers
as the DisplayPort controller. It sets the device data to be the struct
phy so that the DisplayPort controller can easily work with it.

The driver does not have any devicetree bindings because the datasheet
does not list the controller and the phy as distinct units.

The interaction with the controller can be covered by the configure
callback of the phy framework and its displayport parameters.

Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  MAINTAINERS                       |   1 +
  drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig      |   8 ++
  drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile     |   1 +
  drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-dp.c | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 211 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-dp.c


..snip..

diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-dp.c b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-dp.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e5c5494f3636
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-dp.c

..snip..

+
+static int mtk_dp_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mtk_dp_phy *dp_phy;
+	struct phy *phy;
+	struct regmap *regs;
+
+	regs = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node, "mediatek,dp-syscon");
+

Please drop this blank line

+	if (IS_ERR(regs))
+		return PTR_ERR(regs);
+
+	dp_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dp_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dp_phy)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	dp_phy->regs = regs;
+
+	phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &mtk_dp_phy_dev_ops);
+

Same here

+	if (IS_ERR(phy))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(phy), "Failed to create DP PHY: %ld\n", PTR_ERR(phy));
+

Using dev_err_probe automates printing the error, so the correct usage is:

return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(phy), "Failed to create DP PHY\n");

+	phy_set_drvdata(phy, dp_phy);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct platform_driver mtk_dp_phy_driver = {
+	.probe = mtk_dp_phy_probe,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "mediatek-dp-phy",
+	},
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_dp_phy_driver);

Also, in your dt-binding, you mention a compatible for this driver, but I don't see
any, here. This means that you do know what to do, so please do it.

Regards,
Angelo

+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek DP PHY Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux