Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add support for eDP panel on CRD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 10 Feb 05:57 CST 2022, Sankeerth Billakanti wrote:

> Enable the eDP display panel support without HPD on sc7280 platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4:
>   - Create new patch for name changes
>   - Remove output-low
> 
> Changes in v3:
>   - Sort the nodes alphabetically
>   - Use - instead of _ as node names
>   - Place the backlight and panel nodes under root
>   - Change the name of edp_out to mdss_edp_out
>   - Change the names of regulator nodes
>   - Delete unused properties in the board file
> 
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Sort node references alphabetically
>   - Improve readability
>   - Move the pwm pinctrl to pwm node
>   - Move the regulators to root
>   - Define backlight power
>   - Remove dummy regulator node
>   - Cleanup pinctrl definitions
> 
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> index e2efbdd..6dba5ac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts
> @@ -21,6 +21,59 @@
>  	chosen {
>  		stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>  	};
> +
> +	backlight_3v3_regulator: backlight-3v3-regulator {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		regulator-name = "backlight_3v3_regulator";
> +
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +
> +		gpio = <&pm8350c_gpios 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		enable-active-high;
> +
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_power>;
> +	};
> +
> +	edp_3v3_regulator: edp-3v3-regulator {
> +		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +		regulator-name = "edp_3v3_regulator";
> +
> +		regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +		regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +
> +		gpio = <&tlmm 80 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +		enable-active-high;
> +
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&edp_panel_power>;
> +	};
> +
> +	edp_backlight: edp-backlight {
> +		compatible = "pwm-backlight";
> +
> +		power-supply = <&backlight_3v3_regulator>;
> +		pwms = <&pm8350c_pwm 3 65535>;
> +	};
> +
> +	edp_panel: edp-panel {
> +		compatible = "sharp,lq140m1jw46";
> +
> +		power-supply = <&edp_3v3_regulator>;
> +		backlight = <&edp_backlight>;
> +
> +		ports {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +			port@0 {
> +				reg = <0>;
> +				edp_panel_in: endpoint {
> +					remote-endpoint = <&edp_out>;
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &apps_rsc {
> @@ -76,6 +129,44 @@ ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&edp_out {
> +	remote-endpoint = <&edp_panel_in>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_dp {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hot_plug_det>;
> +	data-lanes = <0 1>;
> +	vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> +	vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l1b_0p8>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_edp {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> +	vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
> +	/delete-property/ pinctrl-names;
> +	/delete-property/ pinctrl-0;

If the first device to enable &mdss_edp overwrites pinctrl-{names,0} in
&mdss_dp and removes the properties in &mdss_edp, I think that's a sign
that they should not be in the .dtsi in the first place.

> +};
> +
> +&mdss_edp_phy {
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	vdda-1p2-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
> +	vdda-0p9-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
> +};
> +
> +&mdss_mdp {
> +	status = "okay";
> +};
> +
>  &nvme_3v3_regulator {
>  	gpio = <&tlmm 51 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>  };
> @@ -84,7 +175,36 @@ ap_ts_pen_1v8: &i2c13 {
>  	pins = "gpio51";
>  };
>  
> +&pm8350c_gpios {
> +	edp_bl_power: edp-bl-power {
> +		pins = "gpio7";
> +		function = "normal";
> +		qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_LOW>;
> +		bias-pull-down;

Why do you pull down these two pins? They are both outputs.

> +	};
> +
> +	edp_bl_pwm: edp-bl-pwm {
> +		pins = "gpio8";
> +		function = "func1";
> +		qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_LOW>;
> +		bias-pull-down;
> +	};
> +};
> +
> +&pm8350c_pwm {

As stated previously, this will prevent me from merging this patch until
the LPG/PWM support has been accepted.

As such I would recommend that you drop the backlight parts of this
patch until that has landed - so we can merge the rest of this in the
meantime.

> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&edp_bl_pwm>;
> +};
> +
>  &tlmm {
> +	edp_panel_power: edp-panel-power {
> +		pins = "gpio80";
> +		function = "gpio";
> +		bias-pull-down;

Same here, why is this pulled down?

Thanks,
Bjorn

> +	};
> +
>  	tp_int_odl: tp-int-odl {
>  		pins = "gpio7";
>  		function = "gpio";
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux