I am very sorry that I submitted many times due to the character coding
problem. Can PATCH V4 be used?
I'm scratching my head what you are doing here?
That's the fives time you send out the same patch, so something is going
wrong here :)
Please double check why that lands in your outbox over and over again.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 08.02.22 um 09:14 schrieb zhanglianjie:
after the buffer object is successfully mapped, call radeon_bo_kunmap
before the function returns.
Signed-off-by: zhanglianjie <zhanglianjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
index 377f9cdb5b53..0558d928d98d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c
@@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
handle = msg[2];
if (handle == 0) {
+ radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
DRM_ERROR("Invalid UVD handle!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -559,12 +560,10 @@ static int radeon_uvd_cs_msg(struct
radeon_cs_parser *p, struct radeon_bo *bo,
return 0;
default:
-
DRM_ERROR("Illegal UVD message type (%d)!\n", msg_type);
- return -EINVAL;
}
- BUG();
+ radeon_bo_kunmap(bo);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.20.1