On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:41:58PM +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote:
> @@ -158,6 +159,7 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_destroy(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> mtk_drm_cmdq_pkt_destroy(&mtk_crtc->cmdq_handle);
>
> if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
> + device_link_remove(mtk_crtc->drm_dev, mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev);
> mbox_free_channel(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan);
> mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan = NULL;
> }
[...]
> @@ -956,6 +959,16 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> }
>
> if (mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan) {
> + struct device_link *link;
> +
> + /* add devlink to cmdq dev to make sure suspend/resume order is correct */
> + link = device_link_add(dev, mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev,
> + DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME | DL_FLAG_STATELESS);
> + if (!link) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to link dev=%s\n",
> + dev_name(mtk_crtc->cmdq_client.chan->mbox->dev));
> + }
> +
If device_link_add() failed, doesn't mtk_drm_crtc_create() need to return an error and exit?
OTOH, if device_link_add() failed, won't it bring any side effects to call device_link_remove()?
