TTM takes full control over TTM_PL_SYSTEM placed buffers. This makes driver internal usage of TTM_PL_SYSTEM prone to errors because it requires the drivers to manually handle all interactions between TTM which can swap out those buffers whenever it thinks it's the right thing to do and driver. CPU buffers which need to be fenced and shared with accelerators should be placed in driver specific placements that can explicitly handle CPU/accelerator buffer fencing. Currently, apart, from things silently failing nothing is enforcing that requirement which means that it's easy for drivers and new developers to get this wrong. To avoid the confusion we can document this requirement and clarify the solution. This came up during a discussion on dri-devel: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/232f45e9-8748-1243-09bf-56763e6668b3@xxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h index 76d1b9119a2b..8074d0f6cae5 100644 --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h @@ -35,6 +35,17 @@ /* * Memory regions for data placement. + * + * Buffers placed in TTM_PL_SYSTEM are considered under TTMs control and can + * be swapped out whenever TTMs thinks it is a good idea. + * In cases where drivers would like to use TTM_PL_SYSTEM as a valid + * placement they need to be able to handle the issues that arise due to the + * above manually. + * + * For BO's which reside in system memory but for which the accelerator + * requires direct access (i.e. their usage needs to be synchronized + * between the CPU and accelerator via fences) a new, driver private + * placement that can handle such scenarios is a good idea. */ #define TTM_PL_SYSTEM 0 -- 2.32.0
