On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Paul Menzel <paulepanter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2012, 15:18 +0100 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> Fix regression introduced by 85b144f860176 > > Thanks for the catch and patch. > > Also please add the commit summary to make the commit message self > contained? > > The problem description would also be nice. > >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reported-by: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20121217182752.GA351@x4> > >> --- >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> index 0bf66f9..9f85418 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c >> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, >> * at this point the buffer should be dead, so >> * no new sync objects can be attached. >> */ >> - sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(&bo->sync_obj); >> + sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(bo->sync_obj); > > Any idea, why this only had an impact for one person so far? There are several radeon bugs from drm-next 3.8 that may be ultimately related to this. Alex _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
