In theory if clflush_work_create() somehow fails here, and we don't yet
have mm.pages populated then we end up resetting cache_dirty, which is
likely wrong, since that will potentially skip the flush-on-acquire, if
it was needed.
It looks like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() can arrive here before the
pages are populated.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
index f0435c6feb68..d09365b5eb29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_clflush.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static void __do_clflush(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj));
drm_clflush_sg(obj->mm.pages);
+ obj->cache_dirty = false;
i915_gem_object_flush_frontbuffer(obj, ORIGIN_CPU);
}
@@ -115,6 +116,5 @@ bool i915_gem_clflush_object(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
GEM_BUG_ON(obj->write_domain != I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
}
- obj->cache_dirty = false;
return true;
}
--
2.26.3
