On 2012-11-26 11:07, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> +/*
> + * Subsystem independent description of a videomode.
> + * Can be generated from struct display_timing.
> + */
> +struct videomode {
> + u32 pixelclock; /* pixelclock in Hz */
I don't know if this is of any importance, but the linux clock framework
manages clock rates with unsigned long. Would it be better to use the
same type here?
> + u32 hactive;
> + u32 hfront_porch;
> + u32 hback_porch;
> + u32 hsync_len;
> +
> + u32 vactive;
> + u32 vfront_porch;
> + u32 vback_porch;
> + u32 vsync_len;
> +
> + u32 hah; /* hsync active high */
> + u32 vah; /* vsync active high */
> + u32 de; /* data enable */
> + u32 pixelclk_pol;
What values will these 4 have? Aren't these booleans?
The data enable comment should be "data enable active high".
The next patch says in the devtree binding documentation that the values
may be on/off/ignored. Is that represented here somehow, i.e. values are
0/1/2 or so? If not, what does it mean if the value is left out from
devtree data, meaning "not used on hardware"?
There's also a "doubleclk" value mentioned in the devtree bindings doc,
but not shown here.
I think this videomode struct is the one that display drivers are going
to use (?), in addition to the display_timing, so it would be good to
document it well.
Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
