Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/ttm: change fence_lock to inner lock, v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

This patch looks mostly good, although I think ttm_bo_cleanup_refs becomes overly complicated:
Could this do, or am I missing something?


static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
                   bool interruptible,
                   bool no_wait_reserve,
                   bool no_wait_gpu)
{
    struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
    struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob;
    int put_count;
    int ret = 0;

    /*
     * First, reserve while making sure we're still on the
     * ddestroy list.
     */
retry_reserve:
    spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);

    if (unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) {
        spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
        return 0;
    }

    ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);

    if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
        spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
        if (likely(!no_wait_reserve))
            ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, interruptible);
        if (unlikely(ret != 0))
            return ret;

        goto retry_reserve;
    }

    BUG_ON(ret != 0);

    spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
    ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, interruptible, no_wait_gpu);
    spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);

    if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
        atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
        wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
        spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
        return ret;
    }

    put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
    list_del_init(&bo->ddestroy);
    ++put_count;

    spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
    ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);

    atomic_set(&bo_reserved, 0);
    wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
    ttm_bo_list_ref_sub(bo, put_count, true);

    return 0;
}


On 11/12/2012 03:00 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
I changed the hierarchy to make fence_lock the most inner lock,
instead of outer lock. This will simplify things slightly, and
hopefully makes it easier to make fence_lock global at one point
should it be needed.

To make things clearer, I change the order around in ttm_bo_cleanup_refs
and ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue.

A reservation is taken first, then fence lock is taken and a wait is attempted.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

v2:
  - fix conflict with upstream race fix, simplifies ttm_bo_cleanup_refs
v3:
  - change removal of fence_lock to making it a inner lock instead
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c           | 95 ++++++++++++++++------------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c |  4 +-
  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index a3383a7..70285ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -478,28 +478,26 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
  {
  	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
  	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob;
-	struct ttm_bo_driver *driver;
+	struct ttm_bo_driver *driver = bdev->driver;
  	void *sync_obj = NULL;
  	int put_count;
  	int ret;
- spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
-	(void) ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true);
-	if (!bo->sync_obj) {
-
-		spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
-
-		/**
-		 * Lock inversion between bo:reserve and bdev::fence_lock here,
-		 * but that's OK, since we're only trylocking.
-		 */
-
-		ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);
+	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
+	ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);
+	if (!ret) {
+		spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+		ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true);
- if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY))
+		if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
+			sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(bo->sync_obj);
+			spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+			atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+			wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
  			goto queue;
-
+		}
  		spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+
  		put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
@@ -509,18 +507,11 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
  		ttm_bo_list_ref_sub(bo, put_count, true);
return;
-	} else {
-		spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
  	}
  queue:
-	driver = bdev->driver;
-	if (bo->sync_obj)
-		sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(bo->sync_obj);
-
  	kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
  	list_add_tail(&bo->ddestroy, &bdev->ddestroy);
  	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-	spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
if (sync_obj) {
  		driver->sync_obj_flush(sync_obj);
@@ -546,54 +537,60 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
  			       bool no_wait_gpu)
  {
  	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
+	struct ttm_bo_driver *driver = bdev->driver;
  	struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob;
  	int put_count;
  	int ret = 0;
+	void *sync_obj;
retry:
-	spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
-	ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, interruptible, no_wait_gpu);
-	spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
- if (unlikely(ret != 0))
-		return ret;
+	ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, interruptible,
+				    no_wait_reserve, false, 0);
-retry_reserve:
-	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
+	if (unlikely(ret)) {
+		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
+		return ret;
+	}
if (unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) {
+		atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+		wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
  		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
  		return 0;
  	}
- ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0);
-
-	if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) {
-		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
-		if (likely(!no_wait_reserve))
-			ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, interruptible);
-		if (unlikely(ret != 0))
+	spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+	ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (no_wait_gpu) {
+			spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+			atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
+			wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
+			spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
  			return ret;
+		}
- goto retry_reserve;
-	}
-
-	BUG_ON(ret != 0);
-
-	/**
-	 * We can re-check for sync object without taking
-	 * the bo::lock since setting the sync object requires
-	 * also bo::reserved. A busy object at this point may
-	 * be caused by another thread recently starting an accelerated
-	 * eviction.
-	 */
+		/**
+		 * Take a reference to the fence and unreserve, if the wait
+		 * was succesful and no new sync_obj was attached,
+		 * ttm_bo_wait in retry will return ret = 0, and end the loop.
+		 */
- if (unlikely(bo->sync_obj)) {
+		sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(&bo->sync_obj);
+		spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
  		atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0);
  		wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue);
  		spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
+
+		ret = driver->sync_obj_wait(bo->sync_obj, false, interruptible);
+		driver->sync_obj_unref(&sync_obj);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
  		goto retry;
  	}
+	spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
  	list_del_init(&bo->ddestroy);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
index 1986d00..cd9e452 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_execbuf_util.c
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ void ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(struct list_head *list, void *sync_obj)
  	driver = bdev->driver;
  	glob = bo->glob;
- spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
  	spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
+	spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock);
list_for_each_entry(entry, list, head) {
  		bo = entry->bo;
@@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ void ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(struct list_head *list, void *sync_obj)
  		ttm_bo_unreserve_locked(bo);
  		entry->reserved = false;
  	}
-	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
  	spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
list_for_each_entry(entry, list, head) {
  		if (entry->old_sync_obj)

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux