On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:47:58PM -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > Now that we can handle destruction and re-creation of the arb session, > we can postpone the start of the session to the first submission that > requires it, to avoid keeping it running with no user. > > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 8 ++-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.c | 37 ++++++++++++------- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.h | 4 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_irq.c | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_session.c | 6 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c | 10 +---- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_types.h | 3 ++ > 7 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > index a11e9d5767bf..c08e28847064 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > @@ -2948,9 +2948,11 @@ eb_select_engine(struct i915_execbuffer *eb) > intel_gt_pm_get(ce->engine->gt); > > if (i915_gem_context_uses_protected_content(eb->gem_context)) { > - err = intel_pxp_wait_for_arb_start(&ce->engine->gt->pxp); > - if (err) > - goto err; > + if (!intel_pxp_is_active(&ce->engine->gt->pxp)) { > + err = intel_pxp_start(&ce->engine->gt->pxp); > + if (err) > + goto err; > + } > > if (i915_gem_context_invalidated(eb->gem_context)) { > err = -EACCES; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.c > index f713d3423cea..2291c68fd3a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.c > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ void intel_pxp_init(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > init_completion(&pxp->termination); > complete_all(&pxp->termination); > > + mutex_init(&pxp->arb_mutex); > INIT_WORK(&pxp->session_work, intel_pxp_session_work); > > ret = create_vcs_context(pxp); > @@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ void intel_pxp_mark_termination_in_progress(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > reinit_completion(&pxp->termination); > } > > -static void intel_pxp_queue_termination(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > +static void pxp_queue_termination(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > { > struct intel_gt *gt = pxp_to_gt(pxp); > > @@ -132,31 +133,41 @@ static void intel_pxp_queue_termination(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > * the arb session is restarted from the irq work when we receive the > * termination completion interrupt > */ > -int intel_pxp_wait_for_arb_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > +int intel_pxp_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > { > + int ret = 0; > + > if (!intel_pxp_is_enabled(pxp)) > - return 0; > + return -ENODEV; > + > + mutex_lock(&pxp->arb_mutex); > + > + if (pxp->arb_is_valid) > + goto unlock; > + > + pxp_queue_termination(pxp); > > if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&pxp->termination, > - msecs_to_jiffies(100))) > - return -ETIMEDOUT; > + msecs_to_jiffies(100))) { > + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; > + goto unlock; > + } > + > + /* make sure the compiler doesn't optimize the double access */ > + barrier(); > > if (!pxp->arb_is_valid) > - return -EIO; > + ret = -EIO; > > - return 0; > +unlock: > + mutex_unlock(&pxp->arb_mutex); > + return ret; > } > > void intel_pxp_init_hw(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > { > kcr_pxp_enable(pxp_to_gt(pxp)); > intel_pxp_irq_enable(pxp); > - > - /* > - * the session could've been attacked while we weren't loaded, so > - * handle it as if it was and re-create it. > - */ > - intel_pxp_queue_termination(pxp); > } > > void intel_pxp_fini_hw(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.h > index 91c1a2056309..1f9871e64096 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp.h > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void intel_pxp_init_hw(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > void intel_pxp_fini_hw(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > > void intel_pxp_mark_termination_in_progress(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > -int intel_pxp_wait_for_arb_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > +int intel_pxp_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > void intel_pxp_invalidate(struct intel_pxp *pxp); > #else > static inline void intel_pxp_init(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void intel_pxp_fini(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > { > } > > -static inline int intel_pxp_wait_for_arb_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > +static inline int intel_pxp_start(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > { > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_irq.c > index 196449243515..a230d0034e50 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_irq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_irq.c > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ void intel_pxp_irq_handler(struct intel_pxp *pxp, u16 iir) > GEN12_DISPLAY_APP_TERMINATED_PER_FW_REQ_INTERRUPT)) { > /* immediately mark PXP as inactive on termination */ > intel_pxp_mark_termination_in_progress(pxp); > - pxp->session_events |= PXP_TERMINATION_REQUEST; > + pxp->session_events |= PXP_TERMINATION_REQUEST | PXP_INVAL_REQUIRED; > } > > if (iir & GEN12_DISPLAY_STATE_RESET_COMPLETE_INTERRUPT) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_session.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_session.c > index e9fe757e368a..c21620916710 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_session.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_session.c > @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ static int pxp_terminate_arb_session_and_global(struct intel_pxp *pxp) > /* must mark termination in progress calling this function */ > GEM_WARN_ON(pxp->arb_is_valid); > > - /* invalidate protected objects */ > - intel_pxp_invalidate(pxp); > - > /* terminate the hw sessions */ > ret = intel_pxp_terminate_session(pxp, ARB_SESSION); > if (ret) { > @@ -144,6 +141,9 @@ void intel_pxp_session_work(struct work_struct *work) > if (!events) > return; > > + if (events & PXP_INVAL_REQUIRED) > + intel_pxp_invalidate(pxp); > + doesn't this invalidation change deserves a separated patch? I'm not sure if I understood why we need this change... > if (events & PXP_TERMINATION_REQUEST) { > events &= ~PXP_TERMINATION_COMPLETE; > pxp_terminate(pxp); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c > index e3d178c44e51..35b3fed4ca2f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_tee.c > @@ -63,23 +63,15 @@ static int intel_pxp_tee_io_message(struct intel_pxp *pxp, > static int i915_pxp_tee_component_bind(struct device *i915_kdev, > struct device *tee_kdev, void *data) > { > - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_to_i915(i915_kdev); > struct intel_pxp *pxp = i915_dev_to_pxp(i915_kdev); > - int ret; > > pxp->pxp_component = data; > pxp->pxp_component->tee_dev = tee_kdev; > > /* the component is required to fully start the PXP HW */ > intel_pxp_init_hw(pxp); > - ret = intel_pxp_wait_for_arb_start(pxp); > - if (ret) { > - drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to create arb session during bind\n"); > - intel_pxp_fini_hw(pxp); > - pxp->pxp_component = NULL; > - } > > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > static void i915_pxp_tee_component_unbind(struct device *i915_kdev, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_types.h > index c059a17cbcfe..b3ae49dd73a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_types.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/pxp/intel_pxp_types.h > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > #define __INTEL_PXP_TYPES_H__ > > #include <linux/completion.h> > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > #include <linux/types.h> > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ struct intel_pxp { > * even if the keys are gone, so we can't rely on the HW state of the > * session to know if it's valid and need to track the status in SW. > */ > + struct mutex arb_mutex; /* protects arb session start */ > bool arb_is_valid; > > /* > @@ -40,6 +42,7 @@ struct intel_pxp { > u32 session_events; /* protected with gt->irq_lock */ > #define PXP_TERMINATION_REQUEST BIT(0) > #define PXP_TERMINATION_COMPLETE BIT(1) > +#define PXP_INVAL_REQUIRED BIT(2) > }; > > #endif /* __INTEL_PXP_TYPES_H__ */ > -- > 2.29.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx