Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/ttm: Optimize reservation slightly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/05/2012 03:01 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Hey,

Op 05-11-12 14:31, Thomas Hellstrom schreef:
Reservation locking currently always takes place under the LRU spinlock.
Hence, strictly there is no need for an atomic_cmpxchg call; we can use
atomic_read followed by atomic_write since nobody else will ever reserve
without the lru spinlock held.
At least on Intel this should remove a locked bus cycle on successful
reserve.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>

Is that really a good thing to submit when I am busy killing lru lock around reserve? :-)


If your patch series makes it into the same kernel, let's kill this patch. Otherwise it may live at least for a kernel release. It's not a big thing to rebase against, and I won't complain if your
patch adds another atomic read-modify-write op here. :)

/Thomas

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux