Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/ttm: add ttm_bo_is_reserved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/12/2012 04:58 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c |   12 ++++++------
  include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
index be1148e..d9d8541 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
@@ -161,9 +161,9 @@ int ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool interruptible)
  {
  	if (interruptible) {
  		return wait_event_interruptible(bo->event_queue,
-					       atomic_read(&bo->reserved) == 0);
+					       !ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
  	} else {
-		wait_event(bo->event_queue, atomic_read(&bo->reserved) == 0);
+		wait_event(bo->event_queue, !ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
  		return 0;
  	}
  }
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ void ttm_bo_add_to_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
  	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
  	struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man;
- BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&bo->reserved));
+	BUG_ON(!ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
if (!(bo->mem.placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_NO_EVICT)) { @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_evict(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool interruptible,
  		goto out;
  	}
- BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&bo->reserved));
+	BUG_ON(!ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
evict_mem = bo->mem;
  	evict_mem.mm_node = NULL;
@@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ int ttm_bo_move_buffer(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
  	struct ttm_mem_reg mem;
  	struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
- BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&bo->reserved));
+	BUG_ON(!ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
/*
  	 * FIXME: It's possible to pipeline buffer moves.
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
  {
  	int ret;
- BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&bo->reserved));
+	BUG_ON(!ttm_bo_is_reserved(bo));
  	/* Check that range is valid */
  	if (placement->lpfn || placement->fpfn)
  		if (placement->fpfn > placement->lpfn ||
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
index 9654451..1d71f6b 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h
@@ -705,4 +705,18 @@ extern ssize_t ttm_bo_io(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct file *filp,
extern void ttm_bo_swapout_all(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev); +/**
+ * ttm_bo_is_reserved - return an indication if a ttm buffer object is reserved
+ *
+ * @bo:     The buffer object to check.
+ *
+ * This function returns an indication if a bo is reserved or not, and should
+ * only be used to print an error when it is not from incorrect api usage, since
+ * there's no guarantee that it is the caller that is holding the reservation.
+ */
+static inline bool ttm_bo_is_reserved(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&bo->reserved);
+}
+
  #endif
This looks good, although for clarity we should add in the comments that
if the caller is holding the reservation, the function is guaranteed to return true.

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux