On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:36:59 +0900, Norbert Preining <preining@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Dave, hi Chris, > > thanks for your answers. > > On Di, 23 Okt 2012, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Does booting with i915.i915_enable_rc6=0 help? > > No,booted with that, it happened again on a completely idle > system (well, I believe completely idle, I was doing the > dishes ;-) > > [12437.995026] [drm:i915_hangcheck_hung] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung > [12437.995034] [drm] capturing error event; look for more information in /debug/dri/0/i915_error_state > [12438.000213] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR* failed to set render ring head to zero ctl 00000000 head 5ee06f14 tail 00000000 start 00003000 > [12438.054894] [drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR* render ring initialization failed ctl 0001f001 head 5ee06f14 tail 00000000 start 00003000 > [12439.583064] [drm:i915_hangcheck_hung] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung > [12439.583176] [drm:i915_reset] *ERROR* GPU hanging too fast, declaring wedged! > [12439.583182] [drm:i915_reset] *ERROR* Failed to reset chip. > > New output see here: > http://www.logic.at/people/preining/i915_error_state.gz That has a very similar look to it, so reasonable to assume that is the same issue. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm/commit/?h=ilk-wa-pile&id=0d5fed2de763b49bb1a90140758153481f043757 > > is the missing ingredient. > > I am compiling a kernel with this patch based on current git now. > Should I still use the above kernel cmd argument (i915...rc6=0) > or try without it? Without any rc6 parameter would be best. But if rc6=0 wasn't the solution for you, then I may have identified the wrong w/a. Can I ask you try the patches in that branch until you find one (or more perhaps) that stabilise your system? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel